Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I am currently investigating the behaviour of the Fuji X100F in  High Speed Sync (HSS).

 

  • I am able to sync the built-in flash at speeds up to 1/1000 sec without problem at various apertures.  In aperture priority mode the built-in flash syncs at 1/34 sec (quite low).  Are others seeing the same values in the Exif?

 

  • The X100F is listed has fully compatible with Fuji EF-X500 flash unit that supports HSS.  Is anyone using this combo? Since no HSS is listed in the menu of the X100F how is it achieved?

 

  • The recently release Ver 2.0 firmware is expected to "Improve radio flash controller usability The upgrade allows users to shoot with compatible third party studio flash in high speed sync. or TTL mode via their radio controllers."  Anyone using his X100F in HSS with a radio controllers and if yes which equipment?

 

 

Thank you,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The beauty of the x100 series cameras is they do not require any special flash to achieve HSS because they contain a leaf shutter.  In essence HSS doesn't apply since the camera does not have a flash sync speed.  People often buy the x100 cameras solely for this reason...you can use a cheap Amazon Basics flash and sync at high shutter speeds.   It's best to shoot in manual mode as opposed to aperture priority to get the best results.  Expose for the ambient and then set your flash power accordingly to your taste.

 

There is a limitation of about 1/1000 sec at f2.8 (or maybe f2 I can't recall) as the shutter has a lot of aperture to cover at those wide apertures.  

 

Attached pic is with a $30 speed light fired into a $20 umbrella with my x100s at 1/500 sec at f2.8 using the cameras built-in 3 stop ND filter.   Any radio controller that will trigger the flash will work.  I've used Pocket Wizards, Cybersyncs and most recently the FlashQ triggers which are the size of dice. 

 

Here is a detailed explanation

 

https://fujilove.com/flash-fuji-and-leaf-shutters/

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Therapeuo63
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing your experience.

 

As I wrote, using the built-in flash at higher shutter speeds (in manual mode) for fill-in works perfectly.  I keep the flash settings in the X100F menu selected as TTL.  But I am less successful triggering my off-camera flash (I own a Nikon SB800).

 

From one picture on your website I notice you were using a YN-560iv connected with a cord. With the Elinchrom I assume you use their own brand wireless transmitters.  What about the pictures with caption "YN-560iv ... Godox AD360 ... far right"?  Are you relying on wireless radio transmitters (which ones) or optical using the X100T in commander mode?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That website is FujiLove's magazine so I'm not sure what set up they were using with the YN-560 and the Godox.  I have 2 SB-800 flashes. I have no problem triggering them optically using the X100's commander mode provided there is line of sight.  I've triggered the SB-800s wirelessly using the X100s with Pocket Wizards, FlashQ triggers, Paul C Buff's Cybersync triggers and Nikon sync cables (as in my profile pic here).  I have heard of compatibility issues with Yongnuo(YN)  triggers and Nikon flashes so would avoid those.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

The beauty of the x100 series cameras is they do not require any special flash to achieve HSS because they contain a leaf shutter.  In essence HSS doesn't apply since the camera does not have a flash sync speed.  People often buy the x100 cameras solely for this reason...you can use a cheap Amazon Basics flash and sync at high shutter speeds.   It's best to shoot in manual mode as opposed to aperture priority to get the best results.  Expose for the ambient and then set your flash power accordingly to your taste.

 

There is a limitation of about 1/1000 sec at f2.8 (or maybe f2 I can't recall) as the shutter has a lot of aperture to cover at those wide apertures.  

 

Attached pic is with a $30 speed light fired into a $20 umbrella with my x100s at 1/500 sec at f2.8 using the cameras built-in 3 stop ND filter.   Any radio controller that will trigger the flash will work.  I've used Pocket Wizards, Cybersyncs and most recently the FlashQ triggers which are the size of dice. 

 

Here is a detailed explanation

 

https://fujilove.com/flash-fuji-and-leaf-shutters/

 

Mighty fine image that is.

Edited by Him
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Here is one image taken with my 100F and used with a studio box and two Elinchrom lights. Triggered by a Elinchrom Skyport.

 

Settings:

 

1/250, F16, ISO 200

 

Really pleased with this one.

Edited by Him
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...