Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently bought a X PRO 2. I really love the OVF, but in hard light conditions I prefer the EVF.

As I'm wearing glasses I'm not able to see the whole frame in the EVF.

Wouldn't it be great if we could change the magnification of the EVF (5 to 10% less, a bit more black border) so people who wear glasses could so the whole frame.

Maybe something to propose to fuji for a firmware update?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures.

 

Extra magnification however is more an hardware than a software matter, so, don’t hold your breath waiting for a firmware which would augments magnification.

 

I really don’t think it is possible to change the magnification by software, unless you change resolution and show only part of the image ( which will be a very myopic thing to do, since they did so much to increase it!).

 

You cannot even make the EVF bigger because otherwise the camera size will grow larger then a MF and the point of having a small sensor in a small camera would be even more defeated than it is now already being the X-Pro 2 a rather large camera with a small sensor.

 

http://fujifilm-x.com/it/x-stories/advanced-hybrid-multi-viewfinder-of-x-pro2-part2/

 

“...The X-Pro2 saw a major advancement from X-Pro1 in all aspect. Needless to say, the X-Pro2's Hybrid Multi Viewfinder is no exception. It underwent an extensive review and was built with a new design. The optical unit, electronic device, mechanical construction and etc. all now have new parts.

Among them, the advancement of the electronic device is quite remarkable.
Thanks to the X Trans CMOS III and X Processor Pro, we can now fully utilize the the high performance of the LCD panel. The improvement in resolution, frame rate, and display response are huge. Just a few years back, people debated whether EVF will ever replace OVF. If you look into the X-Pro2's EVF, then you will know that we are now in a different age.

 

There is a dilemma however. The optical design becomes more challenging with the advancement of the LCD panel. With the ability to display higher resolution, the optical performance also needs to be improved. It is the same logic as a lens would become obsolete with the advancement in sensor's ability to achieve higher resolution.

It is easier for the lens to keep up with the high resolution sensor. There is always a way to make higher performance lens by making the lens barrel bigger. But we cannot do the same for the finder. It has to fit within the camera body size.

So the size should remain the same, but the resolution should become higher, and there shouldn't be a distortion. To achieve this, we review and redesign the optical unit.
To be specific, we achieved it by replacing the glass material of the half prism with even higher high refractive index and by adding an aspherical lens to the eyepiece. And to go with the change, lens construction has also been renewed for the objective lens and LCD panel...."

 
Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one reason I bought the X-T2, is I too wear spectacles, just one of the reasons for dumping Nikon because they insist in using crappy eye relief VFs. Sadly I have yet to see a Rangefinder type camera that has a decent VF eye relief. I believe that I should be able to use specs AND a viewfinder.

The eye relief on the X-T2 is I believe 23mm, I don't know what the ER of the X-Pro2 is?

Only a little rant!

 

PS X-Pro2 eye relief is 15mm according to the Fujifilm specifications!

Edited by Mike G
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures...

 

 

If I am walking around taking pictures I don't want to have to remove my glasses each time I take a photo; especially if the photo opportunities happen quickly. I noticed the same issue with the T1 when the EVF was set to the largest magnification, and my solution was to move the camera slightly with it up to my eye. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the T1 as an example of a camera that displays five magnification levels on the EVF.

 

My Pro2 can display three levels of magnification on the EVF. Regular shooting, and two for MF. There is no reason why Fuji couldn't add an option to display the EVF at say 90% magnification to help glasses wearers..

Edited by darngooddesign
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Pardon me if I ask: “ Why don’t you just use the dioptric correction provided by Fuji and forget the glasses?”.

 

That’s why the dioptric correction it is there ( in any camera featuring it). Because they know that wearing glasses will reduce view, so they provide you with the means to not wear glasses while you are taking pictures.

 

Some of us have eyesight that is so bad that the diopter correction is inadequate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of us have eyesight that is so bad that the diopter correction is inadequate.

I'm in the same situation. As a spectacle wearer, I am swithering over whether or not to buy the X-pro2, as the viewfinder is borderline for me, in that I have to move the camera slightly when it's up to my eye, to enable me to see the info round the edges. I have the XT2, which is great, but would like a second body, and love the form factor of the X-Pro2. Oddly, the viewfinder of the X100T is marginally better for me, with my specs on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m sorry to hear that, however it is maybe possible to add a lens made to this purpose, the X pro 1 did offer this possibility.

Don't think a screw-in diopter lens is possible for the X-Pro2, if that's what you meant. I have a -3 diopter that I used with the X-Pro1, but my right has deteriorated marginally, and that takes me beyond the -3 maximum built-in correction on the X-Pro2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe not a screw in but you may find a competent optician (believe it or not some are still out there) who is able to make you a lens and and insert it inside a slide on cap to fit an X-Pro-2 ocular.

 

The lens holder could be a slide one with a O ring or something like this 3D printed ocular made by someone for a X-E camera ( although they are different the principle would stand for an ocular on a X pro 2 too) .

 

maxresdefault.jpg

 

Other possibilities are getting inspired by other people whom found solutions for other Fujis, such as X-T10

 

hqdefault.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

 

I recently bought a X PRO 2. I really love the OVF, but in hard light conditions I prefer the EVF.
As I'm wearing glasses I'm not able to see the whole frame in the EVF.
Wouldn't it be great if we could change the magnification of the EVF (5 to 10% less, a bit more black border) so people who wear glasses could so the whole frame.
Maybe something to propose to fuji for a firmware update?

 

 

 

 

The way I’ve always read the original post (which I am re-quoting here)  is that Op wants a smaller image than the one offered normally.

 

I have a X-T1 the X-T1 enlarges the image (zooming in or out)  but doesn’t make it smaller.

 

We have a standard magnification and starting from that you can zoom in, but, at most, you can zoom back to the standard magnification but not less that , if you can make the image smaller than standard magnification on the X-T1 you either have another camera or I never found that function.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...