Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I often change my button assignments and custom settings to match the specific situation. At the moment, I use this trick in situations with changing light. This trick involves the custom settings and the top FN button next to the shutter button and using the wheel to choose the desired setting.

CS 1: ISO 200, DR 100

CS 2: ISO 400, DR 200
CS 3: ISO 800, DR 400
CS 4: ISO 1600, DR 400
CS 5: ISO 3200, DR 400
CS 6: ISO 6400, DR 400
CS 7: Auto ISO

This lets my change ISO settings with minimum movement. I rarely want to adjust ISO in less than full stops. To me, 1/3 stops is a waste of time and flow. When you assign CS to buttons, it will always start at CS 200.

So if I am out taking pictures at ISO 200 and suddenly find a situation where I need more dynamic range or more DOF without camera shake or faster shutter speed for a fast moving subject, I'll just press the FN button, turn the wheel one or two clicks and half press the shutter - or take the picture immediately. If I want to go back to ISO 200, I just press the FN button twice (because it starts at CS 1).

This works very well on my X-100T and X-E2. Can anyone tell me, if it works with the X-Pro2 and the X-T1 which have hardware dials for ISO? It would be a shame, if you had to make a work around by setting maximum and minimum auto ISO speeds instead of fixed speeds - at least if those cameras behave like mine, where any auto ISO setting will make the camera NOT tell me the predicted shutter speed before I half press the shutter button.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the  X-T1 has very easy acces to ISO with the large dial on the left, I never felt the need for any easier access than that.

That is fine, if you want to get your fingers up to the upper left part of the camera. I'm wondering how the X-T1 responds to the ISO settings in the Custom Settings. Is it at all possible to set specific ISO settings in the Custom Settings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a shame. That probably makes changing ISO settings a lot faster on the two "low end" cameras.

 

 

Indeed: the lower the end, the more state-of-the-art the concept. Lower-end cameras like the X-A1/2, X-M1 offer custom settings that allow users to store a complete camera configuration and quickly switch between pre-configured settings. The higher up you go, the more manual switching is necessary.

 

Fujifilm's cameras are strange that way. They are like Boeing building a new high-tech aircraft without a modern glass cockpit. Instead, Boeing would install a retro cockpit with 30 year old clock dials that requires 2 pilots and 1 flight engineer to operate. No airline in their right mind would buy such a plane. And yet, when we ask Fuji users why they chose Fuji X over other brands, the typical answer isn't that they bought the camera despite its outdated retro controls. No, they say that they bought it because of them.

 

Obviously, those who buy retro cameras like retro controls. But this puts Fujifilm in a niche. The issue is: What about the majority of users who don't appreciate retro controls, but who would still like to own an advanced mirrorless APS-C system with a full range of high-quality lenses and superior image quality? So Fujifilm might want to think about ways to satisfy both groups: the retro loving niche and the majority of other users. How? By implementing smart options that allow users to bypass the manual retro controls and use X cameras like other modern cameras. 

Edited by flysurfer
Link to post
Share on other sites

...they buy something else.

 

Nobody can please everyone all the time. Better to be the best in a limited area than being one of the so many trying to do everything.

 

Fuji excels at this and that’s why I bought a Fuji camera, because it gave me the feeling I was still using a camera like when I bought my first reflex camera (I already used cameras before of that) in 1976.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that they know what they are doing and they know that a relatively small company can only excel at doing things with a limited scope.

 

Fighting Canon and Nikon on their terms would be suicidal.

 

As a company Fuji has more than 50% of their billings from copiers. The remaining 50% is mostly covered by Instax (an incredible success). Only a relatively small part of the profits come from digital cameras and within these, the high end segment is the most representative (or so I read their financials).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, they're trying to carve their own niche. They've found something good and are trying their best to deliver to their clients. They are quite happy where they are now and are focused on developing the next generation X cameras based on their own strengths.

 

When asked, they said that Canon, Nikon and Panasonic aren't even in their league as Fujifilm is too small to be of any significance. When Sony was mentioned, they said that Sony makes very good sensors and being FF, it's a different ball game which they are not looking at going into. The whole sensor size vs. compactness discussion ensued.....again....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I obviously agree, since, as written before, I too believe that Fuji has managed to carve their niche and establish a market base for themselves covering bases left uncovered by the competition.

 

Allow me a digression that is somewhat related to OP’s request about the X-T1 custom setting for ISO, which on this particular camera is governed by a selector dial and not by a programmable button.

 

This is obviously not happened by chance or accident, it happened by design, by choice because it would have been cheaper to make it exactly like that, but at Fuji they have determined that the Fuji customer that they are pursuing has certain wants and “ needs”.

 

I have asked many times FR to join forces with Fuji and ask the people on this forum about their demographics.

 

 

If such a survey were held among us (and maybe if Fuji would extend it to other Fuji communities ) I think that certain distinctive traits would emerge. I am sure that at Fuji marketing department things like these have been done but I am not sure of their geographical distribution. It is very possible that some choices were made assuming that what they had found on a local market might be exported to all markets and, personally I am not convinced of that.

 

I would really like this survey to be held in a very complete and articulate way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...