Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don’t do any flash photography ( aside the very occasional use of the built in strobe in the cameras as a rather close up fill in device) since I am using this camera.

 

In past years I used a number of brands of Studio Strobes on digital Canon cameras without any problem at all.

 

Now I would like to use a slide copying device with a strobe which might have high voltage triggering.

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used ebay flash triggers to wireless trigger old Nikon SB-80 speedlights using my X-T1..

These do not provide TTL but are inexpensive.  Mine are branded ishoot but that does not mean much ;-).

Similar model: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Universal-WANSEN-16-Channels-Wireless-Radio-Remote-Studio-Flash-Trigger-Receiver-/151973937364?hash=item23625a40d4:g:xKkAAOSwoydWtB4I

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for your help but I am afraid that I might have not made myself clear. I wasn’t talking of the physical possibility to use my cameras with manual flashes.

 

What I am talking about is using a flash ( in my case a light box)  with a trigger tension which might be damaging the camera. The unit in question, by the way doesn’t even have a hot shoe.

 

You must not be familiar with this phenomenon perhaps you better read about it before you do anything wrong.

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

This article starts  with” Some old flash units are known to have DANGEROUSLY high trigger voltages...."

 

There would be no problem if one could measure it and one would know what is safe for the Fuji circuitry.

 

Since I cannot measure the unit before buying I was  trying an alternative route.

 

Anyway other solutions above have already addressed the way to solve this problem.

 

Thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest thiswayup

Thanks for your help but I am afraid that I might have not made myself clear. I wasn’t talking of the physical possibility to use my cameras with manual flashes.

 

What I am talking about is using a flash ( in my case a light box)  with a trigger tension which might be damaging the camera. The unit in question, by the way doesn’t even have a hot shoe.

 

You must not be familiar with this phenomenon perhaps you better read about it before you do anything wrong.

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

This article starts  with” Some old flash units are known to have DANGEROUSLY high trigger voltages...."

 

There would be no problem if one could measure it and one would know what is safe for the Fuji circuitry.

 

Since I cannot measure the unit before buying I was  trying an alternative route.

 

 

You can find trigger voltages for most popular older flash units online; very few go over the 300V that most Fuji X will take safely. Eg

 

http://dpanswers.com/roztr/volt_finder.php

 

Checking a trigger volatage is easy with a cheap multimeter

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

..If you're worried the voltage might be too high, then just buy from a seller with a return policy. But sanely, any device safe for digital cameras will be safe for something like a camera with a 300V trigger - that's a freakishly high figure for a digital camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Does this high voltage problem still remain if using a PC cord on my Fujifilm x pro 2? I have shoot about 5 frames with a PC cord on it with a Vivitar 283 flash made in Japan

 

Watch out for the older Viv 283 - I had one that put nearly 400v. One time I used it in a handle grip at an event and it put the voltage right through my face to the camera (Koni-Omega 6x7 RF). Bad PC cord. Crazy!

Edited by Max_Elmar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out for the older Viv 283 - I had one that put nearly 400v. One time I used it in a handle grip at an event and it put the voltage right through my face to the camera (Koni-Omega 6x7 RF). Bad PC cord. Crazy!

 

Wow...must have been a shock.

 

The PC cord probably isn't properly insulated or they may be using materials with the wrong dielectric properties!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...